18/12/2022 06:06:15 PM

Bài viết sưu tầm

ACL Configuration – Lab Exercise

In this lab you will configure standard and extended Access Control Lists.
The routers and PCs have been configured with their network addressing settings, and R2 has a static route for the internal 10.0.1.0/24 and 10.0.2.0/24 networks.

Lab Topology

Numbered Standard ACL

1) Verify that all PCs have connectivity to each other, to R1 and to R2.

From PC1, ping PC2, PC3, R1 and R2.

C:\>ping 10.0.1.11

C:\>ping 10.0.2.10

C:\>ping 10.0.1.1

C:\>ping 10.0.0.2

We have already verified connectivity between the PCs in both subnets. Ping R1

and R2 from PC3.

C:\>ping 10.0.2.1

C:\>ping 10.0.0.2

All connections are successful!

2) Configure and apply a numbered standard ACL on R1 which denies traffic from all hosts in the 10.0.2.0/24 subnet to R2.

The PCs in the 10.0.1.0/24 and 10.0.2.0/24 subnets must maintain connectivity to each other.
The PCs in the 10.0.1.0/24 subnet must maintain connectivity to R2.

The task specifies that a numbered standard ACL be used on R1. This checks the source address only. This prevents us from configuring an ACL inbound on the F0/1 interface which denies traffic from the 10.0.2.0/24 subnet to R2 but permits it to the 10.0.1.0/24 network – that would require an extended ACL.

The only way the task can be completed is by applying the ACL outbound on the F0/0 interface facing R2.

Configure a numbered standard ACL that denies traffic from 10.0.2.0/24. Do not forget to permit from 10.0.1.0/24 as the implicit deny any at the end of the ACL would block the traffic otherwise.

R1(config)#access-list 1 deny 10.0.2.0 0.0.0.255

R1(config)#access-list 1 permit 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255

Do not forget to apply the ACL to the interface.

R1(config)#interface f0/0

R1(config-if)#ip access-group 1 out

3) Test that traffic is secured exactly as required.

Verify PC1 and PC2 can ping R2.
PC3 cannot ping R2.
PC3 can ping PC1 and PC2.

PC1 and PC2 should be able to ping R2.

C:\>ping 10.0.0.2

Pinging 10.0.0.2 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.0.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254

Ping statistics for 10.0.0.2:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

PC3 should not be able to ping R2.

C:\>ping 10.0.0.2

Pinging 10.0.0.2 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.2.1: Destination host unreachable.

Ping statistics for 10.0.0.2:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss)

PC3 should be able to ping PC1 and PC2.

C:\>ping 10.0.1.10

Pinging 10.0.1.10 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.1.10: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127

Reply from 10.0.1.10: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=127

Ping statistics for 10.0.1.10:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 0ms

C:\>ping 10.0.1.11

Pinging 10.0.1.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.1.11: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127

Reply from 10.0.1.11: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=127

Reply from 10.0.1.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=127

Ping statistics for 10.0.1.11:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 5ms, Average = 1ms

Numbered Extended ACL

4) Configure and apply a numbered extended ACL on R1 which permits Telnet access from PC1 to R2. Telnet to R2 must be denied for all other PCs in the network.

All other connectivity must be maintained.
Do not change the existing ACL.
Telnet access has already been enabled on R2. The password is
‘Flackbox’

All traffic from the 10.0.2.0/24 subnet to R2 is already denied by the numbered standard ACL we configured.

We need to create an ACL which will allow Telnet traffic to R2 at 10.0.0.2 from PC1 at 10.0.1.10 but deny it from all other hosts in the 10.0.1.0/24 subnet.

The implicit deny all at the end of the ACL would block Telnet traffic from the other hosts to R2, but it would also block all other traffic from the 10.0.1.0/24 subnet including other applications to R2 and traffic to the 10.0.2.0/24 subnet. We need to explicitly block the Telnet traffic but allow other traffic.

R1(config)#access-list 100 permit tcp host 10.0.1.10 host 10.0.0.2 eq telnet

R1(config)#access-list 100 deny tcp 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 host 10.0.0.2 eq telnet

R1(config)#access-list 100 permit ip any any

The access list should be applied as close to the source as possible, so apply it inbound on interface F1/0. We already have an outbound ACL on F0/0 so we could not apply it there anyway.

R1(config)#interface f1/0

R1(config-if)#ip access-group 100 in

5) Test that traffic is secured exactly as required. Use the command ‘telnet 10.0.0.2’ from the PCs to test and the password ‘Flackbox’. Type ‘exit’ to leave the Telnet session.

Verify that PC1 can ping and Telnet to R2.
PC2 can ping R2 but not Telnet to it.
PC3 cannot ping or Telnet to R2.
The PCs can all ping each other.

PC1 should be able to Telnet to R2.

PC1#telnet 10.0.0.2

Trying 10.0.0.2 ... Open

User Access Verification

Password: Flackbox

R2>

PC2 should be able to ping but not Telnet to R2.

C:\>ping 10.0.0.2

Pinging 10.0.0.2 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.0.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254

Ping statistics for 10.0.0.2:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

C:\>telnet 10.0.0.2

Trying 10.0.0.2 ...

% Connection timed out; remote host not responding

PC3 should not be able to ping or Telnet to R2.

C:\>ping 10.0.0.2

Pinging 10.0.0.2 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.2.1: Destination host unreachable.

Ping statistics for 10.0.0.2:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),

C:\>telnet 10.0.0.2

Trying 10.0.0.2 ...

% Connection timed out; remote host not responding

PC3 should be able to ping PC1 and PC2.

C:\>ping 10.0.1.10

Pinging 10.0.1.10 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.1.10: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127

Ping statistics for 10.0.1.10:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

C:\>ping 10.0.1.11

Pinging 10.0.1.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.1.11: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127

Reply from 10.0.1.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=127

Reply from 10.0.1.11: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127

Ping statistics for 10.0.1.11:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 0ms

6) How many Telnet packets were permitted by the ACL?

Enter ‘show access-list’ to check the hit counts. Note that your values may be different.

R1#show access-lists 100

Extended IP access list 100

permit tcp host 10.0.1.10 host 10.0.0.2 eq telnet (23 match(es))

deny tcp 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 host 10.0.0.2 eq telnet (12 match(es))

permit ip any any (12 match(es))

Named Extended ACL

7) Remove the numbered extended ACL you just configured from the interface. Do not delete the ACL.

R1(config)#int f1/0

R1(config-if)#no ip access-group 100 in

8) Configure and apply a named extended ACL on R1 as follows:

Permit Telnet from PC1 to R2. Telnet to R2 must be denied for all other PCs in the network.
Permit ping from PC2 to R2. Ping to R2 must be denied for all other PCs in the network.
All other connectivity must be maintained.

All traffic from the 10.0.2.0/24 subnet to R2 is already denied by the numbered

standard ACL we configured.

We do need to configure an ACL to secure traffic from the 10.0.1.0/24 subnet.

R1(config)#ip access-list extended F1/0_in

R1(config-ext-nacl)#permit tcp host 10.0.1.10 host 10.0.0.2 eq telnet

R1(config-ext-nacl)#deny tcp 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 host 10.0.0.2 eq telnet

R1(config-ext-nacl)#permit icmp host 10.0.1.11 host 10.0.0.2 echo

R1(config-ext-nacl)#deny icmp 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 host 10.0.0.2 echo

R1(config-ext-nacl)#permit ip any any

Don’t forget to apply the ACL to the interface.

R1(config)#int f1/0

R1(config-if)#ip access-group F1/0_in in

9) Test that traffic is secured exactly as required.

Verify that PC1 cannot ping R2 but can Telnet to it.
PC2 can ping R2 but cannot Telnet to it.
PC3 cannot ping or Telnet to R2.
The PCs can all ping each other.

PC1 cannot ping R2 but can Telnet to it.

C:\>ping 10.0.0.2

Pinging 10.0.0.2 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.1.1: Destination host unreachable.

Ping statistics for 10.0.0.2:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),

C:\>telnet 10.0.0.2

Trying 10.0.0.2 ...Open

User Access Verification

Password:

R2>

PC2 can ping R2 but cannot Telnet to it.

C:\>ping 10.0.0.2

Pinging 10.0.0.2 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.0.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254

Ping statistics for 10.0.0.2:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

C:\>telnet 10.0.0.2

Trying 10.0.0.2 ...

% Connection timed out; remote host not responding

PC3 cannot ping or Telnet to R2.

C:\>ping 10.0.0.2

Pinging 10.0.0.2 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.2.1: Destination host unreachable.

Ping statistics for 10.0.0.2:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),

C:\>telnet 10.0.0.2

Trying 10.0.0.2 ...

% Connection timed out; remote host not responding

PC3 should be able to ping PC1 and PC2.

C:\>ping 10.0.1.10

Pinging 10.0.1.10 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.1.10: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127

Reply from 10.0.1.10: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=127

Reply from 10.0.1.10: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127

Ping statistics for 10.0.1.10:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 0ms

C:\>ping 10.0.1.11

Pinging 10.0.1.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.0.1.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=127

Reply from 10.0.1.11: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127

Ping statistics for 10.0.1.11:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 0ms

» Tin mới nhất:

Giới thiệu phần mềm Rational Rose (18/11/2025)
GIỚI THIỆU VỀ VƯƠNG HẠO VÀ THUẬT TOÁN CHỨNG MINH LOGIC MỆNH ĐỀ (18/11/2025)
MySQL Database trong Python (17/11/2025)
PHẦN 1. CÁCH DÙNG NESSUS ĐỂ SCAN LỖ HỔNG Post published: (17/11/2025)
Bản kế hoạch nghề nghiệp có quan trọng đối với sinh viên IT (17/11/2025)

» Các tin khác:

Lập trình Module với Python (17/12/2022)
Các thành phần của bản yêu cầu hệ thống (17/12/2022)
Thuộc tính Markov (15/12/2022)
Toán tử dấu phẩy (,) (14/12/2022)
ví dụ về tìm khóa của lược đồ (14/12/2022)
Desktop Linux (10/12/2022)
Kiểm tra việc cấp quyền và quyền (01/12/2022)
Ràng buộc toàn vẹn (19/11/2022)
Wireless LAN - Multiple SSID vs VLAN Mapping (18/11/2022)
Cấu hình dự phòng có firewall ASA (17/11/2022)

Hôm nay, ngày

24/11/2025

Tuần học:

Sinh viên tiêu biểu

video

Số lượt truy cập: 10776834